Atlee
Hall Safety Attorney Jaime Jackson Remains in the forefront of Automobile Crash
Avoidance Technologies and Automated Vehicles Speaking Recently to a National
Audience in Los Angeles
Atlee Hall Safety Attorney, Jaime Jackson recently spoke to
a national audience of attorneys, on “Automated Vehicles, and the Future of Car
Crash Litigation” in Los Angeles. Mr. Jackson has recently given several
national and state presentations in Pennsylvania on the new and important
safety topic of Crash Avoidance Technologies and Automated Vehicles. Crash Avoidance Technologies such as
Automatic Emergency Breaking, Lane Keep Assist, Blind Spot Assist, and Adaptive
Cruise Control, when tested and implemented in the correct way are important
safety features that will help reduce injuries in car crashes and save lives.
Many new vehicles are equipped with these important safety technologies, but,
many are still not using this safety equipment.
Equally important, is how the auto manufacturers advertise this technology
and the importance of not misrepresenting the capabilities of crash avoidance
technologies, compared to what would be truly considered, a fully automated
self-driving vehicle. For example, Tesla’s auto-pilot may imply the vehicle is
capable of driving itself, when even as Tesla admits, its not ready for that,
and its automatic emergency braking and lane center assist, are merely crash
avoidance technologies at this point.
We are all in favor of new computer-aided/autonomous-vehicle
technologies that save lives. Atlee Hall has been at the forefront challenging car
companies to improve the safety of their products with smart seat belts, airbags
and improved rollover protection. But new vehicle features can have unintended
consequences, and that’s why there must be accountability on the part of the
multi-billion dollar corporations implementing these changes. As more and more
consumers are attracted to buy new vehicles advertised with improved safety
features, manufacturers will reap the economic benefits. It is, however,
inevitable that the imperfect efforts of the auto industry will lead to some
serious flaws and injury. The traditional counter-balance between the advent of
improvements in motor vehicles and consumer protectionism requires that these
major corporations be accountable for the damages caused – not the consumers
who’ve purchased vehicles with faulty technology or our state and federal
governments already burdened with the huge cost of medical care. In this
country, our economic and civil justice systems remain the primary motivators
to assure consumers that safety takes precedents over profit.