GM CEO testifies before
Congress.
General
Motors CEO Mary Barra’s testimony before a House subcommittee on Tuesday led
all three network news broadcasts Tuesday evening. The networks dedicated more
than nine-and-a-half minutes of coverage to the story, and it is the subject of
extensive print coverage this morning. Generally the coverage casts lawmakers
as angry that Barra was unable to provide more specific answers about GM’s
delayed response to the faulty ignition switch problem. Most reports also note
GM’s decision to retain Kenneth Feinberg, which is almost universally portrayed
as an indication that the company expects to face claims from the families of
those injured or killed in the recalled vehicles.
ABC World News (4/1, lead story, 2:45, Sawyer, 7.43M) reported in its
lead story that GM CEO Mary Barra was “in the hot seat” as she testified before
Congress about crashes linked to faulty ignitions in GM vehicles. ABC (Jarvis)
reported that Barra “was pressed on why the company decided, for nearly a
decade, that fixing the ignition was too expensive.” ABC noted that GM “has now
recalled more than two point six million cars with faulty ignitions.”
NBC Nightly News (4/1, lead story, 3:50, Williams, 7.86M) reported in
its lead story that the hearing “quickly got testy, because her company finds
itself explaining faulty ignition switches, deadly accidents and a recall
that’s at least a decade too late.” NBC (Costello) added that Barra “faced an
angry Congress and promised to do the right thing.”
The CBS Evening News (4/1, lead story, 3:05, Glor, 5.58M) reported in
its lead story that soon after Barra was sworn, “Congresswoman Diana DeGette
displayed a GM ignition switch and said it would have cost the company 57 cents
to fix it.” CBS added that members of the panel “repeatedly referred to GM’s
own documents saying in 2005, engineers decided fixing the problem was not an
acceptable business case.” Barra “kept blaming the old GM for a culture
centered around cost and lack of communication between departments,” but “the committee
often expressed frustration Barra wasn’t able to give better answers.”
USA Today (4/2, Spangler, Healey, 5.82M)
reports that Barra “battled” the subcommittee, which “wanted far more
information about GM’s fatal ignition-switch foul-ups than she was able to
provide.” Barra was “battered for speaking ‘gobbledygook,’ thumped for not
firing an engineer who apparently concealed a change to the potentially deadly
switches, and blasted because GM made an economic decision to keep the flawed
component in production while knowing it didn’t meet GM standards.” She avoided
“any obvious gaffes” and largely avoided “specific answers, saying an internal
investigation is underway into why it took GM so long to address
ignition-switch problems first detected in 2001 this year.”
Reuters (4/2, Klayman, Beech) reports that
Barra called GM’s delayed response “unacceptable,” but failed to provide any
explanation. Rep. Henry Waxman told Barra, “Because GM didn’t implement this
simple fix when it learned about the problem, at least a dozen people have died
in defective GM vehicles.” Reuters notes that Barra also announced that GM had
retained as a consultant Kenneth Feinberg, who will consider possible responses
to the families of those inured or killed in crashes involving the impacted cars.
The Washington Post (4/2, Fletcher, Mufson, 2.33M)
reports that Barra “deflected a barrage of questions on Capitol Hill about the
automaker’s failure to fix a deadly ignition-switch flaw, telling lawmakers
that she was unaware of the decade-old problem until early this year.” While
she “repeatedly apologized” for the defect, she also “repeatedly ducked
lawmakers’ sometimes testy queries, saying she is awaiting the results of an
internal investigation.” The Post also notes that the decision to retain
Feinberg “suggests that GM expects to face additional claims on behalf of
people killed or injured in the recalled vehicles.”
The New York Times (4/2, Vlasic, Wald,
Subscription Publication, 5.41M) reports that in announcing that the company
had retained Feinberg, Barra said, “G.M. has civil and legal responsibilities.
... We are thinking through exactly what those responsibilities are.” The
announcement marked “the first time that G.M. has acknowledged that is
considering making such payments, and comes in the face of mounting pressure
from lawmakers and consumer groups.”
No comments:
Post a Comment